Articles

2024 Presidential Race: Throw the Grumpy Old Men Out

July 06, 2023
B19341da537c739f422bc4d71824aede

The 2024 presidential race is shaping up as the race few people really want. Neither the octogenarian Democratic incumbent nor the near-octogenarian Republican frontrunner is popular. The June 13 Economist/YouGov poll found that only 33% of voters want Donald Trump to run and 26% want President Biden to do so. Strong majorities—56% and 59%, respectively—would prefer they stay out.

This pattern persists across most polling. NBC’s April 18 poll found 70% of Americans believe Mr. Biden “should not run for president” and 60% think Mr. Trump shouldn’t. Thirty-eight percent have positive views of Mr. Biden, while 48% gave him a negative rating—38% very negative. Mr. Trump was at 34% positive, 53% negative—with 44% very negative.

There are lots of reasons Americans may dislike either frontrunner. Maybe they see Mr. Biden as too weak and too far left or Mr. Trump as too destructive and corrupt. But these polls may also reveal a desire for a generational shift. Americans may think we can do better for president than two men who’ll be a combined 160 years old by the time we vote next year.

We’ve seen this desire for younger faces before. In 1960, the president was Dwight Eisenhower. He commanded the D-Day invasion, led the Allies to victory in Europe in World War II, and was an admirable man and a successful president. But he was born in 1890 and nearing 70 as Americans were deciding on his successor.

That year, both parties picked young World War II veterans. Vice President Richard Nixon, 47, easily secured the GOP nod. Sen. John F. Kennedy, 43, bested three older Democrats—former Illinois Gov. Adlai Stevenson II (60), Sen. Stuart Symington (59) and Majority Leader Lyndon B. Johnson (52). In accepting the Democratic nomination, Kennedy called “for a new generation of leadership—new men to cope with new problems and new opportunities.” It was his winning campaign’s constant theme.

For the next 32 years, America’s presidents came from the Greatest Generation—Kennedy, then Johnson, Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and finally George H.W. Bush, who at 18 was for a time the Navy’s youngest fighter pilot in World War II. 

Then came 1992, and Americans again turned to a younger generation, electing Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton, born in 1946—the same year as George W. Bush and Donald Trump. Barack Obama, born in 1961, is a relatively young baby boomer, but with Joe Biden, Americans elected the first president from the pre-boomer Silent Generation, those born between 1928 and 1945. 

There have been other periods of generational dominance of the White House. For 32 years from 1868 to 1900, there were seven Civil War generation presidents. Six served in the military, five in combat, while Grover Cleveland hired a substitute to replace him in the ranks. They were followed between 1900 and 1932 by six presidents born shortly before or after the Civil War. The next 28 years, until 1960, saw three presidents born at the Gilded Age’s peak (the 1880s and 1890s).

It may be time for another generational shift. It’s within the power of the people to bring about. Voters, not party bosses, will decide both party’s nominees. 

The Republican contest already features leaders much younger than Mr. Trump. They include Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (44), former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (51), South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott (57), former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (60), former Vice President Mike Pence (64) and North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum (66).

The 2024 presidential race is shaping up as the race few people really want. Neither the octogenarian Democratic incumbent nor the near-octogenarian Republican frontrunner is popular. The June 13 Economist/YouGov poll found that only 33% of voters want Donald Trump to run and 26% want President Biden to do so. Strong majorities—56% and 59%, respectively—would prefer they stay out.

This pattern persists across most polling. NBC’s April 18 poll found 70% of Americans believe Mr. Biden “should not run for president” and 60% think Mr. Trump shouldn’t. Thirty-eight percent have positive views of Mr. Biden, while 48% gave him a negative rating—38% very negative. Mr. Trump was at 34% positive, 53% negative—with 44% very negative.

There are lots of reasons Americans may dislike either frontrunner. Maybe they see Mr. Biden as too weak and too far left or Mr. Trump as too destructive and corrupt. But these polls may also reveal a desire for a generational shift. Americans may think we can do better for president than two men who’ll be a combined 160 years old by the time we vote next year.

Read More at the WSJ

Related Article

149a958453718670aa1a6468128cd9de
May 07, 2026 |
Article
Hand it to President Trump. He got the Indiana scalps he wanted. He and his allies targeted seven incumbent Republican state senators up for re-election this year. At least five lost their primaries on Tuesday. A sixth leads by three votes. ...
F8f455ff93ef76dfb7493bfce4b0c79c
April 30, 2026 |
Article
As Republicans face a tough election, they must remember the words of Zhang Yu, a commentator on the ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War”: “Attack is the secret of defense.” ...
2727fb82a2598be9b3ac46723573f42e
April 23, 2026 |
Article
The Republican Party faces problems. The Democratic Party is a mess, too. In September 2018, before Democrats flipped 42 House seats, Gallup found that 44% of Americans approved of the Democratic Party while 52% disapproved. ...
5cb7e86527b6ae36e11b6818ff336937
April 16, 2026 |
Article
It’s all so sordid. Faced by a growing number of sexual-assault accusations, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D., Calif.) ended his campaign for governor and resigned from Congress. ...
Button karlsbooks
Button readinglist
Button nextapperance